Cleveland Freightlines Pty Ltd v Transport Workers Union of Australia, Kenneth W Lawson and Gary Sydney Jones [1995] IRCA 110

Cleveland Freightlines Pty Ltd v Transport Workers Union of Australia, Kenneth W Lawson and Gary Sydney Jones [1995] IRCA 110

The Industrial Relations Court of Australia lacked jurisdiction because Cleveland's application sought to raise the validity of the Award as a separate direct attack, no s 179 enforcement proceedings had been brought in this Court in which validity arose collaterally, s 417 did not itself confer jurisdiction, and there had been no remittal from the High Court under s 44 of the Judiciary Act 1903.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 March 1995
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 417 of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 for Declarations Concerning the Validity of the Transport Workers' (interstate Drivers) Award 1988 / Determination of the Third Respondent's Notice of Motion to Dismiss the Application for Lack of Jurisdiction
Outcome
Third respondent's notice of motion granted; application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
['validity of Industrial Award' 'industrial Relations Court of Australia Jurisdiction' 'direct Attack and Collateral Attack on Award Validity' 'section 179 Wage Recovery Proceedings' 'conciliation and Arbitration Power Under S 51(xxxv) of the Constitution']
['industrial Law' 'constitutional Law' 'jurisdiction'] ['validity of Industrial Award' 'industrial Relations Court of Australia Jurisdiction' 'direct Attack and Collateral Attack on Award Validity' 'section 179 Wage Recovery Proceedings' 'conciliation and Arbitration Power Under S 51(xxxv) of the Constitution']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under Section 417 of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 for Declarations Concerning the Validity of the Transport Workers' (interstate Drivers) Award 1988 / Determination of the Third Respondent's Notice of Motion to Dismiss the Application for Lack of Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Industrial Relations Court of Australia had jurisdiction under s 417 of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 to make declarations that the Transport Workers' (Interstate Drivers) Award 1988 was invalid where related s 179 wage recovery proceedings were brought in the Industrial Court of South Australia." 'Whether a constitutional challenge to the validity of an award may be brought as a direct attack in the Industrial Relations Court of Australia absent proceedings in that Court enforcing the award or a remittal from the High Court.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Industrial Relations Court of Australia lacked jurisdiction because Cleveland's application sought to raise the validity of the Award as a separate direct attack, no s 179 enforcement proceedings had been brought in this Court in which validity arose collaterally, s 417 did not itself confer jurisdiction, and there had been no remittal from the High Court under s 44 of the Judiciary Act 1903.

Court Disposition

Third respondent's notice of motion granted; application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • ['There be an order in terms of paragraph 1 of the notice of motion dated 2 February 1995 issued by the third respondent dismissing the application herein.' "The applicant pay the third respondent's costs of the proceedings in this Court." 'As between the applicant and the first and second respondents there be no...