Loretta Craig & Ors v Anthony Johnson & Ors [2018] NSWSC 1539
Privilege was not waived; actions and communications by Ms Inverarity were not plainly inconsistent with maintaining confidentiality; no knowing and voluntary disclosure was made; Evidence Act s 126 does not operate as no waiver was found.
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Lorretta Kistmah Craig & 4 Ors; Defendants: Anthony Francis Johnson & 60 Ors
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Professional Negligence / Procedural Ruling on Privilege (notice of Motion)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' notice of motion dismissed; plaintiffs to pay defendants’ costs.
- Legal Topics
- Client Legal Privilege, Waiver of Privilege
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lorretta Kistmah Craig & 4 Ors
Plaintiffs
Anthony Francis Johnson & 60 Ors
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Professional Negligence / Procedural Ruling on Privilege (notice of Motion)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether privilege claimed over documents produced by Ms Inverarity should be upheld
- 2 Whether privilege was waived by actions or communications
- 3 Whether plaintiffs can access privileged documents under Evidence Act s 126
Ratio Decidendi
Privilege was not waived; actions and communications by Ms Inverarity were not plainly inconsistent with maintaining confidentiality; no knowing and voluntary disclosure was made; Evidence Act s 126 does not operate as no waiver was found.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' notice of motion dismissed; plaintiffs to pay defendants’ costs.
Orders
- The plaintiffs' notice of motion filed on 15 May 2018 is dismissed.
- The plaintiffs are to pay the defendants' costs of the notice of motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment