Keenan v Bundaberg Port Authority [2016] FCA 134

Keenan v Bundaberg Port Authority [2016] FCA 134

The applicant failed to satisfy four of the five prerequisites under s 237(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for leave to bring derivative proceedings. The further amended statement of claim failed to plead material facts necessary to establish viable claims in contract, duty of care, or unconscionable conduct, giving no reasonable prospect of success against the respondents for those claims. The summary judgment and strike out applications were therefore granted.

Parties
Applicant: Clive Phillip Keenan; First Respondent: Bundaberg Port Authority; Second Respondent: Bundaberg Ports Corporation Pty Ltd; Third Respondent: Port of Bundaberg, a wholly owned business of Gladstone Ports Corporation
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Applications for Summary Judgment and Derivative Action Leave / Interlocutory Application, Decision on Summary Judgment and Derivative Proceedings
Outcome
Derivative action application and joinder dismissed with costs; summary judgment for the second and third respondents and for the first respondent on certain claims; strike-out of statement of claim with leave to replead remaining claim; costs orders against applicant.
Legal Topics
Application for Summary Judgment, Striking Out Pleadings, Derivative Action (leave to Bring Proceedings on Behalf of Company), Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Unconscionable Conduct, Contract and Duty of Care
Practice and Procedure Corporations Law Application for Summary Judgment Striking Out Pleadings Derivative Action (leave to Bring Proceedings on Behalf of Company) Misleading or Deceptive Conduct Unconscionable Conduct Contract and Duty of Care

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 27 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clive Phillip Keenan

Applicant

Bundaberg Port Authority

First Respondent

Bundaberg Ports Corporation Pty Ltd

Second Respondent

Port of Bundaberg, a wholly owned business of Gladstone Ports Corporation

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Applications for Summary Judgment and Derivative Action Leave / Interlocutory Application, Decision on Summary Judgment and Derivative Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave under s 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to bring proceedings on behalf of Coral Coast Mariculture Pty Ltd
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's further amended statement of claim discloses any reasonable cause of action or has reasonable prospects of success
  3. 3 Whether summary judgment should be granted for the respondents under s 31A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to satisfy four of the five prerequisites under s 237(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for leave to bring derivative proceedings. The further amended statement of claim failed to plead material facts necessary to establish viable claims in contract, duty of care, or unconscionable conduct, giving no reasonable prospect of success against the respondents for those claims. The summary judgment and strike out applications were therefore granted.

Court Disposition

Derivative action application and joinder dismissed with costs; summary judgment for the second and third respondents and for the first respondent on certain claims; strike-out of statement of claim with leave to replead remaining claim; costs orders against applicant.

Orders

  • The applicant's interlocutory application of 30 July 2015 for leave under s 237 and joinder of Coral Coast Mariculture Pty Ltd is dismissed with costs.
  • Summary judgment is entered against the applicant in favour of the second and third respondents under s 31A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).