Clough Engineering Ltd v Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [No 4] [2007] FCA 2110
The Court granted a stay and extended the injunctions because the discharge orders would in practical effect finally determine the proceeding, an application for leave to appeal could be brought promptly and would raise substantive and reasonably arguable grounds, refusal would cause the applicant potentially irreparable prejudice and render any appeal nugatory by permitting immediate payment of US$21.5 million under the performance guarantees, while the respondents' prejudice was limited to being kept out of money and could be compensated by interest.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Execution and Extension of Interlocutory Injunctions / Notice of Motion Following Orders Discharging Injunctions, Pending Determination of an Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Stay of execution granted and injunctions extended pending determination of an application for leave to appeal, subject to the applicant filing an application for leave to appeal or notice of appeal by 4.00 pm on 16 January 2008; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Execution' 'interlocutory Injunctions Pending Appeal' 'performance Guarantees' 'leave to Appeal' 'section 51 AA of the Trade Practices Act 1976 (cth)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Execution and Extension of Interlocutory Injunctions / Notice of Motion Following Orders Discharging Injunctions, Pending Determination of an Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether execution of the orders discharging injunctions should be stayed pending determination of an application for leave to appeal.' 'Whether the injunctions restraining calls upon and payment under performance guarantees should be extended pending determination of the foreshadowed leave application.' 'Whether the applicant had reasonably arguable grounds of appeal concerning construction of clause 3.3 of the Construction Contract, s 51AA of the Trade Practices Act 1976 (Cth), and balance of convenience.' 'Whether prejudice to the applicant if a stay were refused outweighed prejudice to the respondents if a stay were granted.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted a stay and extended the injunctions because the discharge orders would in practical effect finally determine the proceeding, an application for leave to appeal could be brought promptly and would raise substantive and reasonably arguable grounds, refusal would cause the applicant potentially irreparable prejudice and render any appeal nugatory by permitting immediate payment of US$21.5 million under the performance guarantees, while the respondents' prejudice was limited to being kept out of money and could be compensated by interest.
Court Disposition
Stay of execution granted and injunctions extended pending determination of an application for leave to appeal, subject to the applicant filing an application for leave to appeal or notice of appeal by 4.00 pm on 16 January 2008; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['This Notice of Motion be returnable instanter.' 'The execution of orders made on 21 December 2007 be stayed pending the determination of an application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Honourable Justice Gilmour delivered on 21 December 2007 by the applicant.' "Upon the applicant's undertaking as to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment