CLUTHA DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD v DOWD [1995] NSWCA 79
The jury's award of $70,000 for deafness and tinnitus was out of all proportion to the damage suffered and was therefore appealably excessive. The appropriate award, assessed by the Court, is $40,000. Precise comparison of verdicts is not permitted in such cases, as established by authority, and relief is granted based on the unreasonable excessiveness of the sum awarded.
- Parties
- Appellant: Clutha Developments Pty Ltd; Respondent: Dowd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of the New South Wales Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; jury's award set aside; judgment entered for $40,000; other remedial orders made; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Damages, Personal Injury, Industrial Deafness, Jury Trials, Excessive Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clutha Developments Pty Ltd
Appellant
Dowd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of the New South Wales Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether comparison of like verdicts is permissible in industrial deafness cases
- 2 Whether the jury's verdict awarding $70,000 for deafness and tinnitus was appealably excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The jury's award of $70,000 for deafness and tinnitus was out of all proportion to the damage suffered and was therefore appealably excessive. The appropriate award, assessed by the Court, is $40,000. Precise comparison of verdicts is not permitted in such cases, as established by authority, and relief is granted based on the unreasonable excessiveness of the sum awarded.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; jury's award set aside; judgment entered for $40,000; other remedial orders made; costs reserved.
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Set aside the judgment of the District Court (PJ Phelan DCJ) following the jury's verdict
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment