Clutha v Millar [2002] NSWSC 362
The plaintiff's pleading asserts a continuing breach of the directors' duty of care over a defined period, resulting in a single category of loss. As non-negligible damage (incurrence of debts/trading losses) was first suffered more than six years before proceedings were commenced, the action is statute barred under the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceeding / Interlocutory (determination of Notice of Motion to Dismiss Against D1 D7 on Limitation Grounds)
- Outcome
- Proceeding to be dismissed as against first to seventh defendants, subject to determination of application to amend.
- Legal Topics
- ['limitation of Actions' "negligence (director's Duty of Care)" 'practice and Procedure' 'summary Dismissal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceeding / Interlocutory (determination of Notice of Motion to Dismiss Against D1 D7 on Limitation Grounds)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff's pleading in negligence and breach of duty against directors asserts multiple breaches, some within and some outside the limitation period, or a single breach outside the limitation period" 'Whether the claim against D1-D7 is statute barred under the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's pleading asserts a continuing breach of the directors' duty of care over a defined period, resulting in a single category of loss. As non-negligible damage (incurrence of debts/trading losses) was first suffered more than six years before proceedings were commenced, the action is statute barred under the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Proceeding to be dismissed as against first to seventh defendants, subject to determination of application to amend.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment