CLUTHA LTD v DANSWAN [1993] NSWCA 64
The Court held (affirming Moroney CCJ) that where a loss results from both pre- and post-1987 injuries, Schedule 6, Pt6, CL6 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 deems the whole loss to have resulted from the later injury for compensation purposes. Therefore, it was correct to assess the worker's lump sum compensation at 15%, even though 7.5% was attributable to a pre-1987 injury. There was no legal basis to deduct prior compensation paid, nor to divide the assessment contrary to the deeming provision.
- Parties
- Appellant: Clutha Ltd; Respondent: Peter Danswan
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Lump Sum Compensation, Transitional Provisions, Successive Injury, Calculation of Compensation, Construction of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clutha Ltd
Appellant
Peter Danswan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a worker's loss of left leg at or above the knee, resulting from both pre and post 1987 injuries, is deemed to have resulted from the post-1987 injury for the purposes of lump sum compensation under s66 Workers Compensation Act 1987 and its transitional provisions
- 2 Whether Moroney CCJ erred in assessing compensation by reference to the whole loss (15%), rather than only that attributable to the post-1987 injury (7.5%)
- 3 Whether credit for compensation already paid under s16 of the 1926 Act should be deducted from the lump sum under the 1987 Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held (affirming Moroney CCJ) that where a loss results from both pre- and post-1987 injuries, Schedule 6, Pt6, CL6 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 deems the whole loss to have resulted from the later injury for compensation purposes. Therefore, it was correct to assess the worker's lump sum compensation at 15%, even though 7.5% was attributable to a pre-1987 injury. There was no legal basis to deduct prior compensation paid, nor to divide the assessment contrary to the deeming provision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Lump sum compensation under s66 awarded: $10,884.30 in respect of 15% loss of use of the left leg at or above the knee.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment