CLW16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 299
Leave to amend the notice of appeal was refused as the proposed grounds relating to extortion as persecution and threats by Muslim men lacked merit, were either not properly raised or fully explained in terms of Convention reason, and did not demonstrate jurisdictional error by the FCCA or IAA. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Amend Notice of Appeal and Appeal Disposition
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'refugee Status' 'amendment of Notice of Appeal' 'federal Court Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Amend Notice of Appeal and Appeal Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend the notice of appeal' 'Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to consider if extortion constituted persecution for a Convention reason' 'Whether the Federal Circuit Court judge erred in concluding that possible threats by Muslim men did not amount to persecution']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend the notice of appeal was refused as the proposed grounds relating to extortion as persecution and threats by Muslim men lacked merit, were either not properly raised or fully explained in terms of Convention reason, and did not demonstrate jurisdictional error by the FCCA or IAA. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to amend the notice of appeal refused.' 'The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment