In the matter of an application by Clive Raymond Ferris for an Inquiry into an election in the Australian Workers Union. [1982] FCA 230
Court not satisfied that there were reasonable grounds for the application made by Mr Ferris, as evidence was insufficient, largely hearsay or speculative, and allegations did not disclose irregularities capable of affecting the election result.
- Parties
- Applicant: Clyde Raymond Ferris; Respondent: Australian Workers' Union; Third Party: Australian Electoral Office
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Election Inquiry Under Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 / Final Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Union Election, Registered Organisation, Election Irregularity, Union Membership Eligibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clyde Raymond Ferris
Applicant
Australian Workers' Union
Respondent
Australian Electoral Office
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Application for Election Inquiry Under Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 / Final Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether ballot papers were sent to all eligible voters and only to eligible voters in the union election
- 2 Whether alleged irregularities would have affected the result of the election
- 3 Compliance with statutory requirements for an election inquiry application
Ratio Decidendi
Court not satisfied that there were reasonable grounds for the application made by Mr Ferris, as evidence was insufficient, largely hearsay or speculative, and allegations did not disclose irregularities capable of affecting the election result.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The Application by Clyde Raymond Ferris for an inquiry into an election in the Australian Workers' Union is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment