CMD v Children’s Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 150
The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that CMD poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children, due to his breaches of professional boundaries, lack of full disclosure, credibility concerns, and the strong possibility that some of the alleged conduct occurred, justifying affirmation of the refusal to grant a Working with Children Check Clearance.
- Parties
- Applicant: CMD; Respondent: Children's Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; refusal affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Working With Children Check, Child Related Work, Risk Assessment, Review of Administrative Decision, Professional Boundaries in Education
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CMD
Applicant
Children's Guardian
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether CMD poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children under the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012
- 2 Whether the refusal to grant a Working with Children Check Clearance should be affirmed
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that CMD poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children, due to his breaches of professional boundaries, lack of full disclosure, credibility concerns, and the strong possibility that some of the alleged conduct occurred, justifying affirmation of the refusal to grant a Working with Children Check Clearance.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; refusal affirmed
Orders
- The decision of the Children's Guardian of 25 February 2016 refusing to issue CMD with a Working with Children Check Clearance is affirmed.
- Publication or broadcast, without the leave of the Tribunal, of the name or other identifying information of any child referred to in the proceedings is prohibited.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment