CNV17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 59

CNV17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 59

The appeal was dismissed with costs. The Court held that the reasons for dismissing the appeal are those given by Greenwood J, with McKerracher and Burley JJ agreeing, in BJI17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 58, which addressed the contentions raised by this appellant and related appellants.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 April 2020
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Judicial Review Decision / Appeal Dismissed
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['immigration Assessment Authority' 'safe Haven Visa' 'judicial Review' 'legal Unreasonableness' 'unreliable Information' 'receiving Country Safety' 'relocation Within Receiving Country']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Judicial Review Decision / Appeal Dismissed

  1. 1 ['Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority relied on reports and information contradicted by and inconsistent with other cited reports on material issues relating to safety in the receiving country and in a place of relocation within the receiving country.' 'Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority acted upon unreliable information.' 'Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority reached a decision affected by legal unreasonableness.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed with costs. The Court held that the reasons for dismissing the appeal are those given by Greenwood J, with McKerracher and Burley JJ agreeing, in BJI17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 58, which addressed the contentions raised by this appellant and related appellants.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The appellant pay the costs of the first respondent of and incidental to the appeal.']