CNY v NSW Public Trustee and Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 25

CNY v NSW Public Trustee and Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 25

The Tribunal found that retaining the property would not provide sufficient funds for the protected person's ongoing care, as she has debts and insufficient income, and the property cannot be let without significant repairs for which there is no reliable plan or funding. The special significance of the property and...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 January 2017
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Determination
Outcome
Decision affirmed
Legal Topics
['review of Administrative Decision' 'powers and Duties of Trustee and Guardian' 'sale of Protected Person’s Property']
['administrative Law' 'guardianship'] ['review of Administrative Decision' 'powers and Duties of Trustee and Guardian' 'sale of Protected Person’s Property']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Administrative Review / Final Determination

  1. 1 ['Whether the decision to sell the property belonging to the protected person is the correct and preferable decision']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that retaining the property would not provide sufficient funds for the protected person's ongoing care, as she has debts and insufficient income, and the property cannot be let without significant repairs for which there is no reliable plan or funding. The special significance of the property and the protected person’s wishes were considered, but priority was given to her welfare and financial interests. Therefore, the correct and preferable decision is to sell the property.

Court Disposition

Decision affirmed

Orders

  • ['The decision of the NSW Public Guardian and Trustee dated 23 October 2015 to sell the property belonging to the protected person is affirmed.']