Co-Operative Bulk Handling Ltd v The Waterside Workers Federation of Australian Workers Union Western Australia Branch Industral Union Of Workers [1980] FCA 69
The Kwinana storage facilities, jetty and wharf formed the Kwinana Grain Terminal, and the storage facilities were adjacent to and in the vicinity of the jetty and wharf. The receival, storage, treatment, movement and loading of grain destined for shipment had a sufficiently close geographical and functional connection with loading ships to be work of a waterside worker and work in the stevedoring industry under the WWF rules. Because the employees were already working in the stevedoring industry, Rule 6(e) displaced the age requirements. North Fremantle employees retained WWF membership from the time the terminal formed part of a shipping operation until Rule 7 operated. The declarations...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 1980
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S.144 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 for a Declaration as to Entitlement to Become and Remain Members of an Organisation / Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- Application refused; declarations sought by the applicant were refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['union Membership Eligibility' 'constitutional Coverage of an Organisation' 'waterside Worker' 'stevedoring Industry' 'grain Handling and Ship Loading' 'meaning of Adjacent to a Wharf']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S.144 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 for a Declaration as to Entitlement to Become and Remain Members of an Organisation / Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether CBH employees at the Kwinana and North Fremantle terminals were entitled to become and remain members of The Waterside Workers Federation of Australia.' 'Whether work involving receipt, storage, treatment, movement and loading of grain at Kwinana was work of a waterside worker or engagement in the stevedoring industry under the WWF rules.' 'Whether the Kwinana storage facilities were adjacent to or in the vicinity of the jetty and wharf despite the distance between them.' 'Whether employees at North Fremantle retained WWF membership after that terminal ceased to be used for shipping.' 'Whether WWF Rule 6 age requirements applied to employees already working in the stevedoring industry.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Kwinana storage facilities, jetty and wharf formed the Kwinana Grain Terminal, and the storage facilities were adjacent to and in the vicinity of the jetty and wharf. The receival, storage, treatment, movement and loading of grain destined for shipment had a sufficiently close geographical and functional connection with loading ships to be work of a waterside worker and work in the stevedoring industry under the WWF rules. Because the employees were already working in the stevedoring industry, Rule 6(e) displaced the age requirements. North Fremantle employees retained WWF membership from the time the terminal formed part of a shipping operation until Rule 7 operated. The declarations...
Court Disposition
Application refused; declarations sought by the applicant were refused.
Orders
- ['The declarations sought in the application are refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment