R v Gallagher; Ex parte Australian Coal and Shale Employees' Federation [1966] HCA 45
The Tribunal's order was not made in settlement of any new dispute at Kemira Colliery, and the Tribunal's power to vary the valid federal award by inserting a bans clause was not dependent on the existence of a new inter-State dispute. The prosecutor's challenge therefore failed, and the health and safety character of the underlying working conditions did not remove the matter from the Tribunal's industrial dispute jurisdiction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Prohibition Concerning Variation of a Federal Coal Mining Industry Award / Application to Make Absolute a Rule Nisi for Prohibition
- Outcome
- Order nisi discharged; costs of the respondent company to be paid by the prosecutor.
- Legal Topics
- ['coal Industry Tribunal Powers' 'variation of Award' 'bans Clause' 'industrial Dispute' 'mine Health and Safety']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Prohibition Concerning Variation of a Federal Coal Mining Industry Award / Application to Make Absolute a Rule Nisi for Prohibition
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal's order inserting a bans clause was made in settlement of a dispute confined to Kemira Colliery and therefore beyond the Tribunal's competence." 'Whether a bans clause may be inserted by variation of an award only where appropriate to settle an inter-State dispute supervening since the award was made.' "Whether a dispute concerning the health or safety of mine employees can be an industrial dispute within the meaning of the Coal Industry Act 1946-1965 Cth given the Joint Coal Board's power under s. 14 (2) (h)."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's order was not made in settlement of any new dispute at Kemira Colliery, and the Tribunal's power to vary the valid federal award by inserting a bans clause was not dependent on the existence of a new inter-State dispute. The prosecutor's challenge therefore failed, and the health and safety character of the underlying working conditions did not remove the matter from the Tribunal's industrial dispute jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Order nisi discharged; costs of the respondent company to be paid by the prosecutor.
Orders
- ['Order nisi discharged.' 'Order that the costs of the respondent company be paid by the prosecutor.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment