R v Gallagher; Ex parte Australian Coal and Shale Employees' Federation [1966] HCA 45

R v Gallagher; Ex parte Australian Coal and Shale Employees' Federation [1966] HCA 45

The Tribunal's order was not made in settlement of any new dispute at Kemira Colliery, and the Tribunal's power to vary the valid federal award by inserting a bans clause was not dependent on the existence of a new inter-State dispute. The prosecutor's challenge therefore failed, and the health and safety character of the underlying working conditions did not remove the matter from the Tribunal's industrial dispute jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Prohibition Concerning Variation of a Federal Coal Mining Industry Award / Application to Make Absolute a Rule Nisi for Prohibition
Outcome
Order nisi discharged; costs of the respondent company to be paid by the prosecutor.
Legal Topics
['coal Industry Tribunal Powers' 'variation of Award' 'bans Clause' 'industrial Dispute' 'mine Health and Safety']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Prohibition Concerning Variation of a Federal Coal Mining Industry Award / Application to Make Absolute a Rule Nisi for Prohibition

  1. 1 ["Whether the Tribunal's order inserting a bans clause was made in settlement of a dispute confined to Kemira Colliery and therefore beyond the Tribunal's competence." 'Whether a bans clause may be inserted by variation of an award only where appropriate to settle an inter-State dispute supervening since the award was made.' "Whether a dispute concerning the health or safety of mine employees can be an industrial dispute within the meaning of the Coal Industry Act 1946-1965 Cth given the Joint Coal Board's power under s. 14 (2) (h)."]

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's order was not made in settlement of any new dispute at Kemira Colliery, and the Tribunal's power to vary the valid federal award by inserting a bans clause was not dependent on the existence of a new inter-State dispute. The prosecutor's challenge therefore failed, and the health and safety character of the underlying working conditions did not remove the matter from the Tribunal's industrial dispute jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Order nisi discharged; costs of the respondent company to be paid by the prosecutor.

Orders

  • ['Order nisi discharged.' 'Order that the costs of the respondent company be paid by the prosecutor.']