Coalcliff Collieries Ltd v Campbell [1964] HCA 53
Because s. 11 (1) (b) deems the worker's average weekly earnings before injury to move with changes in the basic wage, that deemed change is material on an application under s. 60 to review weekly payments; it made no difference that the amendment was introduced in s. 11 rather than s. 60, so the award increasing the respondent's weekly payments was upheld.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Workers' Compensation Appeal / Appeal to the High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['review of Weekly Payments' 'partial Incapacity' 'basic Wage Adjustment' 'change in Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Workers' Compensation Appeal / Appeal to the High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Workers' Compensation Commission's power under s. 60 of the Workers' Compensation Act of New South Wales to review a weekly payment may be exercised where s. 11 (1) (b) deems a worker's average weekly earnings before injury to increase or reduce with changes in the basic wage."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because s. 11 (1) (b) deems the worker's average weekly earnings before injury to move with changes in the basic wage, that deemed change is material on an application under s. 60 to review weekly payments; it made no difference that the amendment was introduced in s. 11 rather than s. 60, so the award increasing the respondent's weekly payments was upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment