Coast 2 Coast Earthmoving Pty Ltd v Stratti [2009] FCA 130
Default judgment should be entered where the respondent has been effectively served, has not appeared or filed a defence, and the applicant has substantiated the claim and costs in accordance with the Federal Court Rules.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the applicant
- Legal Topics
- ['default Judgment' 'service of Process' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Civil / Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether default judgment should be entered for the applicant when the respondent failed to appear or file a defence' 'Whether service was effective under substituted service orders' 'Entitlement to costs and the proper calculation thereof']
Ratio Decidendi
Default judgment should be entered where the respondent has been effectively served, has not appeared or filed a defence, and the applicant has substantiated the claim and costs in accordance with the Federal Court Rules.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the applicant
Orders
- ['Judgment in the sum of $87,527.23 for the applicant against the respondent' "Respondent to pay applicant's costs fixed at $8,000.00"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment