COE16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1370

COE16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1370

No appealable error was established because the appellant's claims were either not clearly presented as independent grounds, were considered by the IAA, or did not fall within the statutory exception for new information. The requirements of s 473DD were correctly applied and any alleged failure did not amount to material jurisdictional error.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 August 2019
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'exceptional Circumstances for New Information' 'protection Visas' 'refugee Assessment' 'application of S 473 DD Migration Act']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['judicial Review' 'exceptional Circumstances for New Information' 'protection Visas' 'refugee Assessment' 'application of S 473 DD Migration Act']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority erred in its consideration of new information provided by the appellant' "Whether the IAA failed to consider or properly consider the appellant's claims" 'Whether the IAA correctly applied s 473DD of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether any failure to consider claims amounted to jurisdictional error']

Ratio Decidendi

No appealable error was established because the appellant's claims were either not clearly presented as independent grounds, were considered by the IAA, or did not fall within the statutory exception for new information. The requirements of s 473DD were correctly applied and any alleged failure did not amount to material jurisdictional error.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appellant has leave to rely upon grounds 4 and 5 of the notice of appeal.' 'The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or taxed."]