Goodenough v Coffs Harbour City Council (No 2) [2024] NSWCATAD 313
The public interest considerations in favour of disclosure of the requested information about infrastructure works and rezoning (transparency, accountability, oversight of public funds, importance to community) significantly outweigh considerations against disclosure (contractual/confidential obligations, commercial sensitivity, potential prejudice). The developments are of public significance and controversy, and the contractual confidentiality provisions permit lawful disclosure. The requested information is not objectively commercially sensitive. Accordingly, the respondent's decision refusing release is set aside and disclosure is ordered, subject to short delay for possible appeal.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Shannon Goodenough; Second Applicant: H A Bachrach (Nom) Pty Ltd (ACN 005 026 326); Respondent: Coffs Harbour City Council; First Intervenor: Coffs Harbour Airport Pty Ltd; Second Intervenor: NSW Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- decision of respondent set aside; access to requested information granted
- Legal Topics
- Access to Government Information, Public Interest Disclosure, Confidentiality, Government Contracts, Local Government Tendering, Conflict of Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shannon Goodenough
First Applicant
H A Bachrach (Nom) Pty Ltd (ACN 005 026 326)
Second Applicant
Coffs Harbour City Council
Respondent
Coffs Harbour Airport Pty Ltd
First Intervenor
NSW Information Commissioner
Second Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the information sought from Council should be released under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (GIPA Act)
- 2 Whether public interest considerations in favour of disclosure outweigh those against disclosure, specifically items 1(d), 1(g), 4(b), and 4(d) of s14 GIPA Act
- 3 Whether information sought is commercially confidential and/or its disclosure prejudices legitimate business interests
Ratio Decidendi
The public interest considerations in favour of disclosure of the requested information about infrastructure works and rezoning (transparency, accountability, oversight of public funds, importance to community) significantly outweigh considerations against disclosure (contractual/confidential obligations, commercial sensitivity, potential prejudice). The developments are of public significance and controversy, and the contractual confidentiality provisions permit lawful disclosure. The requested information is not objectively commercially sensitive. Accordingly, the respondent's decision refusing release is set aside and disclosure is ordered, subject to short delay for possible appeal.
Court Disposition
decision of respondent set aside; access to requested information granted
Orders
- Orders 4 and 5 made on 12 March 2024 set aside in relation to specified information/documents, which are no longer confidential material as defined in order 2 made on 12 March 2024
- Respondent's decision is set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment