Coles Group Property Developments Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1531

Coles Group Property Developments Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1531

As the parties reached agreement at a conciliation conference addressing the substantive contentions and the Court was satisfied all statutory and procedural pre-conditions for consent were met, the development consent was granted subject to agreed conditions.

Parties
Applicant: Coles Group Property Developments Ltd; Respondent: Blacktown City Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 November 2019
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Final Determination After Conciliation Conference
Outcome
Appeal upheld. Development consent granted subject to conditions.
Legal Topics
Development Application, Concept Approval, Stage 1 Works, Shopping Centre

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Coles Group Property Developments Ltd

Applicant

Blacktown City Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Class 1 Appeal / Final Determination After Conciliation Conference

  1. 1 Whether development consent should be granted for the proposed shopping centre development under the amended application
  2. 2 Whether pre-conditions for the granting of consent have been met including infrastructure agreements and approval of relevant authorities

Ratio Decidendi

As the parties reached agreement at a conciliation conference addressing the substantive contentions and the Court was satisfied all statutory and procedural pre-conditions for consent were met, the development consent was granted subject to agreed conditions.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld. Development consent granted subject to conditions.

Orders

  • The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application No. SPP-17-00047 to rely upon specified amended plans.
  • Court notes that as amendments are minor, no order is required under s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.