Dunstan v von Doussa [2008] FCA 97
Section 18(1) of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) confers a right to intervene on the Attorney-General, who upon intervention is deemed to be a party to the proceeding; leave to intervene is not required, but would have been granted if necessary.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Reasons for Interlocutory Order (joinder of Attorney General)
- Outcome
- Order for joinder of the Attorney-General as a party to the proceeding (interlocutory); reasons given for that order.
- Legal Topics
- ["attorney General's Right to Intervene" 'joinder of Parties' 'judicial Review Under ADJR Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Reasons for Interlocutory Order (joinder of Attorney General)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Attorney-General has a right to intervene in proceedings under s 18 of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)' "Whether leave is required for the Attorney-General's intervention" "Circumstances for Attorney-General's intervention 'on behalf of the Commonwealth'"]
Ratio Decidendi
Section 18(1) of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) confers a right to intervene on the Attorney-General, who upon intervention is deemed to be a party to the proceeding; leave to intervene is not required, but would have been granted if necessary.
Court Disposition
Order for joinder of the Attorney-General as a party to the proceeding (interlocutory); reasons given for that order.
Orders
- ['The Attorney-General is joined as a party to the proceeding pursuant to s 18(1) of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth).']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment