Dunstan v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [2004] FCA 1137
The subpoenas sought by the applicant were refused as the documents sought lacked any potential relevance to the issues in dispute as identified in the pleadings. Neither the telephone records nor the documents held by the ACT Sentence Administration Board were relevant to the present proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Issue Subpoenas
- Outcome
- Application for leave to issue subpoenas refused
- Legal Topics
- ['subpoenas' 'leave to Issue Subpoenas' 'relevance of Documents' 'case Management']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Issue Subpoenas
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to issue subpoenas for production of documents' 'Whether the documents sought have potential relevance to the issues in dispute']
Ratio Decidendi
The subpoenas sought by the applicant were refused as the documents sought lacked any potential relevance to the issues in dispute as identified in the pleadings. Neither the telephone records nor the documents held by the ACT Sentence Administration Board were relevant to the present proceedings.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to issue subpoenas refused
Orders
- ['The application for leave to issue the subpoenas is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment