McGee v R [2024] NSWDC 125
There is no jurisdiction for the District Court to entertain an appeal under section 11A of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) from the Local Court’s refusal to grant leave for a second annulment application because the statutory right of appeal requires that leave for the further application be granted; absence of leave precludes there being any valid 'application under section 4' to refuse, and thus no basis for appeal exists.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Leave to Appeal—district Court (nsw)
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- ['annulment of Conviction' 'jurisdiction of District Court on Appeal' 'requirement for Leave for Second Annulment Application' 'appeals as Creatures of Statute']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Leave to Appeal—district Court (nsw)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the District Court has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a Local Court refusal to grant leave for a second annulment application under section 11A of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no jurisdiction for the District Court to entertain an appeal under section 11A of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) from the Local Court’s refusal to grant leave for a second annulment application because the statutory right of appeal requires that leave for the further application be granted; absence of leave precludes there being any valid 'application under section 4' to refuse, and thus no basis for appeal exists.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Orders
- ['Application for leave to appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment