Saggers v Environment Protection Authority [2013] NSWADT 204
There was no evidence that the officer failed to act in good faith or that reasonable searches were not conducted. The officer’s actions, while not exemplary in clarity or timeliness, met the statutory requirements, and there was no basis for referral under section 112.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Decision on Papers
- Outcome
- application dismissed, decision affirmed
- Legal Topics
- ['access to Government Information' 'reasonable Search' 'good Faith Conduct' 'review of Administrative Decision' 'public Interest Considerations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Decision on Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Environment Protection Authority conducted a reasonable search for documents under the GIPA Act' 'Whether any documents were improperly withheld from the applicant' 'Whether the officer responsible failed to exercise duties in good faith under section 112 of the GIPA Act']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence that the officer failed to act in good faith or that reasonable searches were not conducted. The officer’s actions, while not exemplary in clarity or timeliness, met the statutory requirements, and there was no basis for referral under section 112.
Court Disposition
application dismissed, decision affirmed
Orders
- ['The decision under review is affirmed.' 'The application for a referral pursuant to section 112 of the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment