Sorrenson v Versluis [2023] NSWCATCD 151

Sorrenson v Versluis [2023] NSWCATCD 151

The respondent constructed acoustic panels within the semi-rural zone of Lot 8 without obtaining executive committee consent as required by the by-laws and Housing Design Guidelines, which are valid and not harsh, unconscionable or oppressive under the Act; the respondent must remove the unauthorised structure.

Parties
Applicant: Colin Sorrenson; Respondent: Pieter Versluis; Other Party: Community Association DP 270312
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 September 2023
Procedural Posture
Application / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed
Legal Topics
Community Title by Laws, Compliance With Housing/landscape Guidelines, Enforcement of by Laws, Removal of Unauthorised Structures

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Colin Sorrenson

Applicant

Pieter Versluis

Respondent

Community Association DP 270312

Other Party

Procedural Posture

Application / Principal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's acoustic panel structure was erected in breach of community association by-laws
  2. 2 Whether the respondent had obtained the necessary consent for the structure
  3. 3 Whether the relevant by-laws were harsh, unconscionable or oppressive under s 130(1) Community Land Management Act 2021 (NSW)

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent constructed acoustic panels within the semi-rural zone of Lot 8 without obtaining executive committee consent as required by the by-laws and Housing Design Guidelines, which are valid and not harsh, unconscionable or oppressive under the Act; the respondent must remove the unauthorised structure.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • The respondent shall remove the structure comprised of acoustic panels constructed on Lot 8 in Community Association DP 270312, to the extent that it is constructed within the semi-rural or open space zone of Lot 8, within two months from the publication of these reasons for decision.