Smith & Anor v Smith [2011] NSWSC 938

Smith & Anor v Smith [2011] NSWSC 938

The deceased made no provision for either plaintiff, who, as adult children with limited means and disabilities, satisfied the jurisdictional requirement that adequate provision was not made. Despite the defendant's significant contribution to the estate and the plaintiffs' conduct, a modest lump sum should be awarded to each plaintiff to provide housing and basic needs, while considering the size of the estate and competing interests.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 August 2011
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Judgment on Merits
Outcome
Provision made for each plaintiff by way of a lump sum, subject to further submissions on costs; parties directed to bring in short minutes of order reflecting the reasons.
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'testamentary Freedom' 'adult Children Claims']
['equity' 'succession Law'] ['family Provision' 'testamentary Freedom' 'adult Children Claims']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Application / Judgment on Merits

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether adequate provision was made in the will for the proper maintenance, education or advancement in life of the plaintiffs under the Succession Act 2006' 'Quantum and nature of provision, if any, to be made for each plaintiff given the competing claim of the defendant']

Ratio Decidendi

The deceased made no provision for either plaintiff, who, as adult children with limited means and disabilities, satisfied the jurisdictional requirement that adequate provision was not made. Despite the defendant's significant contribution to the estate and the plaintiffs' conduct, a modest lump sum should be awarded to each plaintiff to provide housing and basic needs, while considering the size of the estate and competing interests.

Court Disposition

Provision made for each plaintiff by way of a lump sum, subject to further submissions on costs; parties directed to bring in short minutes of order reflecting the reasons.

Orders

  • ['Each of the plaintiffs (Keith and Darren) is to receive a lump sum of $77,500 from the estate for purchase of a demountable mobile home, furniture, and contingencies, conditional upon vacating the Tweed Heads property within an agreed period after notice of payment.' 'Provision to be reduced by $450 per week (or...