Platford v van Veenendaal and Shoalhaven City Council [2018] NSWLEC 27
The Council failed to consider relevant matters in determining to grant consent to the development application, specifically the effects of coastal inundation by wave runup on the screen wall and the likely effect of the screen wall on wave runup flows. These failures were material and invalidate the consent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Development consent declared invalid and set aside; injunction granted; proceedings listed for directions on costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review of Development Consent' 'coastal Zone Management' 'development Controls' 'environmental Risk Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether council was the correct consent authority to grant development consent for works associated with a seawall' 'Whether council properly considered height controls for ancillary structures under Shoalhaven Development Control Plan 2014' 'Whether council considered effects of coastal inundation (wave runup) on the screen wall of the boathouse arm' 'Whether council failed to consider relevant matters under Shoalhaven DCP, Shoalhaven LEP, and Coastal Protection SEPP']
Ratio Decidendi
The Council failed to consider relevant matters in determining to grant consent to the development application, specifically the effects of coastal inundation by wave runup on the screen wall and the likely effect of the screen wall on wave runup flows. These failures were material and invalidate the consent.
Court Disposition
Development consent declared invalid and set aside; injunction granted; proceedings listed for directions on costs.
Orders
- ['Declares that the development consent granted by Shoalhaven City Council in respect of the Development Application 16/1341 is invalid and of no effect.' 'Sets aside the Purported Consent for DA 16/1341.' 'Grants an injunction restraining the first respondent from undertaking any development in reliance upon the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment