O'Keeffe v Carlysle in the Estate of Garvan [2006] NSWSC 93
The informal handwritten document, though expressing the deceased's testamentary intentions, was not intended by the deceased to operate as his will at the time of death. It was unsigned, undated, and lacked the naming of an executor, failing to meet the requirements for admission to probate under s18A.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Probate / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['informal Wills' 'testamentary Intentions' 'revocation of Will']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Probate / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an informal document not complying with formal will requirements should be admitted to probate under s18A of the Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898' 'Whether the deceased intended this informal document to operate as his will']
Ratio Decidendi
The informal handwritten document, though expressing the deceased's testamentary intentions, was not intended by the deceased to operate as his will at the time of death. It was unsigned, undated, and lacked the naming of an executor, failing to meet the requirements for admission to probate under s18A.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim dismissed
Orders
- ["Plaintiff's claim dismissed" 'Costs of all parties to be paid out of the estate, those of the defendants on the indemnity basis']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment