Walker v Racing New South Wales [2021] NSWSC 1215
The plaintiff was granted an extension of time because the two grounds were intertwined, she had an interest in challenging the decision, and Racing NSW suffered no real prejudice. The judicial review nevertheless failed. Racing NSW did not unilaterally ban or direct the plaintiff to stand down; it offered to lift the Club's interim suspension on that condition and the Club accepted it, and the plaintiff's solicitor had described her standing down as voluntary. Section 29C did not govern the interim suspension because it concerns final sanctions after satisfaction of non-compliance, whereas the suspension was imposed pending investigation; Racing NSW had separate powers under s 14 of the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Principal Judgment on Summons Filed 26 July 2021
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's summons dismissed; plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs on an ordinary basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['power to Suspend Race Club Registration' 'interim Suspension Pending Investigation' 'show Cause Notice' 'fit and Proper Person' 'registration and Licensing Functions' 'extension of Time for Judicial Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Principal Judgment on Summons Filed 26 July 2021
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff should be granted an extension of time to commence judicial review of the first decision under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 59.10.' "Whether Racing NSW's condition that the plaintiff stand down as Chairperson of Mudgee Race Club pending investigation was invalid because the Club's suspension was invalid under s 29C of the Thoroughbred Racing Act 1996 (NSW)." 'Whether Racing NSW had power under s 14AA of the Thoroughbred Racing Act 1996 (NSW) to issue the show cause notice concerning whether the plaintiff was a fit and proper person to hold office as an official of a NSW race club.' 'Whether the plaintiff was relevantly registered for the purposes of s 14AA of the Thoroughbred Racing Act 1996 (NSW).']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was granted an extension of time because the two grounds were intertwined, she had an interest in challenging the decision, and Racing NSW suffered no real prejudice. The judicial review nevertheless failed. Racing NSW did not unilaterally ban or direct the plaintiff to stand down; it offered to lift the Club's interim suspension on that condition and the Club accepted it, and the plaintiff's solicitor had described her standing down as voluntary. Section 29C did not govern the interim suspension because it concerns final sanctions after satisfaction of non-compliance, whereas the suspension was imposed pending investigation; Racing NSW had separate powers under s 14 of the...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's summons dismissed; plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs on an ordinary basis.
Orders
- ["The plaintiff's summons filed on 26 July 2021 is dismissed." "The plaintiff is to pay the first defendant's costs on an ordinary basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment