COLOMBO AND ORS v WALSH AND ORS [1997] NSWCA 70
Leave to discontinue the appeal is granted, third opponent to pay claimant's/appellant's costs of the appeal, but only to the extent of costs relating to drafting a notice of appeal equivalent to a notice of cross-appeal; no order as to costs of the motion.
- Parties
- Appellant: Colombo and Ors; Third Respondent/opponent: Walsh and Ors
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Motion for Leave to Discontinue Appeal
- Outcome
- leave to discontinue granted; limited costs order; no order as to costs of the motion
- Legal Topics
- Discontinuance of Proceeding, Protective Appeals, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colombo and Ors
Appellant
Walsh and Ors
Third Respondent/opponent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Motion for Leave to Discontinue Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Should leave to discontinue the appeal be granted?
- 2 Should the third respondent pay the claimant's/appellant's costs of the appeal and the motion?
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to discontinue the appeal is granted, third opponent to pay claimant's/appellant's costs of the appeal, but only to the extent of costs relating to drafting a notice of appeal equivalent to a notice of cross-appeal; no order as to costs of the motion.
Court Disposition
leave to discontinue granted; limited costs order; no order as to costs of the motion
Orders
- Appellant granted leave to discontinue appeal.
- Third opponent to pay claimant's/appellant's costs of the appeal, limited to costs relating to drafting a notice of appeal as could have been done by way of cross-appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment