Comandate Marine Corp v Pan Australia Shipping [2006] FCA 1370
The determination of security to be provided was based on reasonable estimates of overseas legal costs, conducted with reference to evidence and judicial experience, balancing competing estimates and opt for those most credible. Each party is to bear its own costs for the notice of motion, due to the parties' failure to resolve the issue sensibly between themselves necessitating court involvement.
- Parties
- Appellant: Comandate Marine Corp; Respondent: Pan Australia Shipping Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Hearing Order
- Outcome
- Security for costs fixed; own costs for each party.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Court Cooperation, Costs of Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Comandate Marine Corp
Appellant
Pan Australia Shipping Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Hearing Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Determination of appropriate security for costs to be provided by the respondent, including indemnity for reinstatement of orders and estimation of costs for proceedings in overseas jurisdictions.
- 2 Determination of the allocation of costs for the appellant's notice of motion.
Ratio Decidendi
The determination of security to be provided was based on reasonable estimates of overseas legal costs, conducted with reference to evidence and judicial experience, balancing competing estimates and opt for those most credible. Each party is to bear its own costs for the notice of motion, due to the parties' failure to resolve the issue sensibly between themselves necessitating court involvement.
Court Disposition
Security for costs fixed; own costs for each party.
Orders
- Respondent to provide as security $21,221.42 in accordance with paragraph 9 of the Orders made by Rares J on 6 September 2006.
- Each party to bear its own costs of the Appellant's notice of motion filed on 6 October 2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment