Comcare v Patrick Operations Pty Ltd & Anor [2006] NSWCA 151
No reason shown to depart from the ordinary rule; the appellant failed to persuade the Court that an 'order otherwise' was warranted. The costs of the appeal are governed by the Rules, and the notice of motion was dismissed with costs.
- Parties
- Appellant: Comcare; First Respondent: Patrick Operations Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Anshun Pty Ltd (formerly Patrick Stevedoring Co (Victoria) Pty Ltd)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion in Appeal / Costs Determination Following Discontinuance of Appeal
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Discontinuance of Appeal, Contribution, Indemnity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Comcare
Appellant
Patrick Operations Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Anshun Pty Ltd (formerly Patrick Stevedoring Co (Victoria) Pty Ltd)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion in Appeal / Costs Determination Following Discontinuance of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should order an 'order otherwise' regarding costs after discontinuance of appeal
- 2 Appropriate apportionment of liability and contribution in cross-claims arising from divisible damage
Ratio Decidendi
No reason shown to depart from the ordinary rule; the appellant failed to persuade the Court that an 'order otherwise' was warranted. The costs of the appeal are governed by the Rules, and the notice of motion was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Notice of motion filed on 19 May 2006 dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment