Comcare v Levett I.G. [1995] FCA 783
A respondent who suffered an injury before the commencement of the 1988 Act but whose impairment only became permanent after the Act commenced is not excluded from entitlement to compensation under s. 24, as s. 124(3) applies only if permanent impairment occurred before that date.
- Parties
- Applicant: COMCARE; Respondent: IAN GORDON LEVETT
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal / Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; Tribunal decision affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Compensation for Permanent Impairment, Transitional Provisions, Tribunal Obligations to Make Factual Findings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
COMCARE
Applicant
IAN GORDON LEVETT
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal / Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Construction of s. 124(3) of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth)
- 2 Meaning of 'permanent impairment' and 'being an impairment'
- 3 Whether respondent's impairment became permanent after the commencement date
Ratio Decidendi
A respondent who suffered an injury before the commencement of the 1988 Act but whose impairment only became permanent after the Act commenced is not excluded from entitlement to compensation under s. 24, as s. 124(3) applies only if permanent impairment occurred before that date.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; Tribunal decision affirmed
Orders
- The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal made on 6 April 1995 is affirmed.
- The application is otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment