Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games v Reebok International Limited [2000] NSWCA 185
The orders made by the primary judge to permit internal legal advisers access to the edited sponsorship agreement, balancing commercial confidentiality with the prima facie right of inspection and relevant legal interests, were a valid exercise of discretion and not erroneous.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games; Opponent: Reebok International Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Commercial Confidentiality, Document Inspection, Sponsorship Agreement, Interlocutory Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games
Claimant
Reebok International Limited
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 What test applies when production or inspection of documents is to be limited on the ground of commercial confidentiality?
- 2 Did the primary judge apply the correct test?
- 3 Did the primary judge make adequate findings of fact and consider relevant matters relating to access and competitive advantage?
Ratio Decidendi
The orders made by the primary judge to permit internal legal advisers access to the edited sponsorship agreement, balancing commercial confidentiality with the prima facie right of inspection and relevant legal interests, were a valid exercise of discretion and not erroneous.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment