Commissioner for the Police Integrity Commission v Walker [2006] NSWSC 645
The proceedings were not improperly constituted as the Commissioner is permitted under s 119 of the Police Integrity Commission Act, with the adapted application of Supreme Court Rules, to commence separate proceedings for contempt. The request for declaratory relief, even if inappropriate, is not in itself a reason to stay or dismiss the summons.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Stay, Strike Out or Dismiss / On Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Notice of motion seeking stay, strike out or dismissal refused
- Legal Topics
- ['contempt' 'police Integrity Commission' 'proper Plaintiff' 'procedural Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Stay, Strike Out or Dismiss / On Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceedings for contempt were improperly constituted' 'Whether declaratory relief is appropriate in contempt proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were not improperly constituted as the Commissioner is permitted under s 119 of the Police Integrity Commission Act, with the adapted application of Supreme Court Rules, to commence separate proceedings for contempt. The request for declaratory relief, even if inappropriate, is not in itself a reason to stay or dismiss the summons.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion seeking stay, strike out or dismissal refused
Orders
- ['Relief sought by the notice of motion is declined']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment