R v Hawi & ors (No 9) [2011] NSWSC 1655
Pseudonym orders were granted for five witnesses found to be particularly vulnerable due to personal circumstances supported by confidential affidavit evidence; for other witnesses, the public interest in open justice and fair trial was not outweighed by general witness concerns.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Application for Pseudonym Orders for Witnesses
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- ['witness Protection' 'pseudonym Orders' 'open Justice' 'public Interest Immunity']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Application for Pseudonym Orders for Witnesses
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether pseudonym orders should be made for certain civilian eye-witnesses in a criminal trial' 'Balancing open justice and fair trial principles against witness protection and public interest considerations']
Ratio Decidendi
Pseudonym orders were granted for five witnesses found to be particularly vulnerable due to personal circumstances supported by confidential affidavit evidence; for other witnesses, the public interest in open justice and fair trial was not outweighed by general witness concerns.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- ['Application granted in respect of witnesses identified by numbers 98, 99, 132, 245, and 247; refused for others.' 'No publication of evidence, submissions, or references relating to the application.' 'True names of ordered witnesses not to be adduced or disclosed.' 'Witnesses to give evidence under pseudonyms.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment