Notification under section 130 by Police Association of New South Wales of a dispute with Commissioner of Police re Single Unit Policing [2015] NSWIRComm 29
The Commission considered that the documents developed through the collaborative conference process would enhance the safety of police officers engaged in remote and isolated work and provide a sensible solution to the parties' differences, and that contested proceedings were unlikely to advance either party's case beyond the draft protocols.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Notification Under Section 130 of a Dispute / Statement After Conferences in the Industrial Relations Commission
- Outcome
- Statement issued; significant progress recorded but no final agreement reached.
- Legal Topics
- ['single Unit Policing' 'cooperative Employment Relations' 'response Policing' 'random Breath Testing' 'police Premises' 'remote or Isolated Work' 'draft Protocols and Safety Checklist']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notification Under Section 130 of a Dispute / Statement After Conferences in the Industrial Relations Commission
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the dispute concerning the tasking and deployment of New South Wales police officers as a single unit could be resolved by proposed protocols and safety checklists.' 'Whether single unit policing for first response duties or single unit stationary random breath testing should continue.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission considered that the documents developed through the collaborative conference process would enhance the safety of police officers engaged in remote and isolated work and provide a sensible solution to the parties' differences, and that contested proceedings were unlikely to advance either party's case beyond the draft protocols.
Court Disposition
Statement issued; significant progress recorded but no final agreement reached.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment