Commissioner of Police v Langosch [2012] NSWSC 499
The balance between the right to freedom of assembly/speech and the rights of other citizens is not tipped in favour of making a s 25 prohibition order, given the significance of the date, the genuine purpose of the commemoration, and the nature of likely inconvenience. The disruption does not, in the circumstances, warrant the deprivation of statutory protections for participants.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Prohibition Order Under Summary Offences Act 1988 Part 4 / Final Determination at First Instance
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['public Assemblies' 'unlawful Assembly' 'summary Offences Act 1988 S 25' 'freedom of Assembly']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Prohibition Order Under Summary Offences Act 1988 Part 4 / Final Determination at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the public assembly scheduled for 15 May 2012 should be denied the protections afforded under s 24 of the Summary Offences Act 1988 by making an order under s 25' "What criteria should guide the exercise of the Court's discretion under s 25 to make a prohibition order"]
Ratio Decidendi
The balance between the right to freedom of assembly/speech and the rights of other citizens is not tipped in favour of making a s 25 prohibition order, given the significance of the date, the genuine purpose of the commemoration, and the nature of likely inconvenience. The disruption does not, in the circumstances, warrant the deprivation of statutory protections for participants.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- ['Summons dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment