Keighley v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) [1971] HCA 51

Keighley v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) [1971] HCA 51

Clause 3 created, for each employee, one trust taking effect on the single specified event of the employee ceasing to be employed, except by dismissal or quitting service without consent. That event could occur before the settlor's death, and the death of the settlor was not made a condition precedent to the trust taking effect. The settlement therefore did not contain a trust in respect of the property to take effect after the settlor's death within s. 102 (2) (a), so the property was not included in the dutiable estate under that provision.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal Concerning Death Duty Assessment Under the Stamp Duties Act, 1920 NSW / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales on a Stated Case
Outcome
Appeal allowed with costs; order of the Court of Appeal set aside.
Legal Topics
['death Duty' 'dutiable Estate' 'settlement Containing Trust to Take Effect After Death' 'condition Precedent' 'construction of Trust Deed']
['taxation' 'stamp Duties' 'trusts and Estates'] ['death Duty' 'dutiable Estate' 'settlement Containing Trust to Take Effect After Death' 'condition Precedent' 'construction of Trust Deed']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Concerning Death Duty Assessment Under the Stamp Duties Act, 1920 NSW / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales on a Stated Case

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether assets subject to the trusts of the 5 June 1956 deed were deemed to be included in the deceased settlor's dutiable estate under s. 102 (2) (a) of the Stamp Duties Act, 1920 NSW." 'Whether cl. 3 of the settlement created a trust to take effect after the death of the settlor, or instead a trust taking effect when an employee ceased to be employed for reasons other than dismissal or quitting service without consent.']

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 3 created, for each employee, one trust taking effect on the single specified event of the employee ceasing to be employed, except by dismissal or quitting service without consent. That event could occur before the settlor's death, and the death of the settlor was not made a condition precedent to the trust taking effect. The settlement therefore did not contain a trust in respect of the property to take effect after the settlor's death within s. 102 (2) (a), so the property was not included in the dutiable estate under that provision.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed with costs; order of the Court of Appeal set aside.

Orders

  • ['The questions set out in the stated case were answered: (a) $1,784,516; (b) $382,832.71; (c) by the respondent.']