Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Iinvest Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2014] NSWSC 1257
The declarations of trust executed by the company with respect to Blackburn and Brecon did not validly create a trust for the Harker-Mortlock Family Trust or its beneficiaries; instead, they purported to create a trust for the company itself, which is legally ineffective. Therefore, neither the properties nor the related choses in action are trust property, and Mr Harker-Mortlock lacks standing to defend or cross-claim based on the trust. Consequently, the application to set aside default judgment for possession is refused, and summary judgment in favour of the bank is appropriate.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Commonwealth Bank of Australia; First Defendant: Iinvest Pty Ltd (In Liquidation); Second Defendant: James Harker-Mortlock
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Default Judgment and Related Motions / Post Judgment, Applications to Set Aside Default Judgment and Summary Judgment Motions
- Outcome
- Application to set aside default judgment refused; defence and cross-claim struck out; summary judgment for possession confirmed; leave granted for second defendant to re-plead in his own right; costs awarded to plaintiff; writs of possession previously stayed, now dissolved.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment for Possession, Trust Property Status, Standing of Beneficiary When Trustee Insolvent, Unconscionable Conduct, Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Effectiveness of Lease Against Mortgagee
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Plaintiff
Iinvest Pty Ltd (In Liquidation)
First Defendant
James Harker-Mortlock
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Default Judgment and Related Motions / Post Judgment, Applications to Set Aside Default Judgment and Summary Judgment Motions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether default judgment for possession should be set aside
- 2 Whether properties and associated rights are held on trust
- 3 Standing of Mr Harker-Mortlock to bring claim as beneficiary when trustee is insolvent
Ratio Decidendi
The declarations of trust executed by the company with respect to Blackburn and Brecon did not validly create a trust for the Harker-Mortlock Family Trust or its beneficiaries; instead, they purported to create a trust for the company itself, which is legally ineffective. Therefore, neither the properties nor the related choses in action are trust property, and Mr Harker-Mortlock lacks standing to defend or cross-claim based on the trust. Consequently, the application to set aside default judgment for possession is refused, and summary judgment in favour of the bank is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside default judgment refused; defence and cross-claim struck out; summary judgment for possession confirmed; leave granted for second defendant to re-plead in his own right; costs awarded to plaintiff; writs of possession previously stayed, now dissolved.
Orders
- Application to set aside default judgment for possession entered on 3rd July 2013 refused.
- Stay of the writs of possession in respect of two properties dissolved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment