Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Hester [2019] NSWSC 1842
Where a defence has been struck out, the defendant fails to file any amended defence disclosing a defence at law, and there is no evidence or argument supporting a lawful defence, the plaintiff is entitled to default judgment for possession of land.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Default Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Default judgment for possession of land granted to the plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ['default Judgment' 'possession of Land' 'defence Struck Out']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Default Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff is entitled to default judgment for possession of land after the defence was struck out and no amended defence was filed.' 'Whether any defence at law has been disclosed by the defendant.']
Ratio Decidendi
Where a defence has been struck out, the defendant fails to file any amended defence disclosing a defence at law, and there is no evidence or argument supporting a lawful defence, the plaintiff is entitled to default judgment for possession of land.
Court Disposition
Default judgment for possession of land granted to the plaintiff.
Orders
- ['Leave to the plaintiff to move for default judgment against the defendant.' 'Judgment for the plaintiff for possession of the whole of the land in folio identifier 1/1041112 situated at and known as 34-36 MacDougall Crescent (also known as 34 MacDougall Crescent), Hamlyn Terrace, in the State of New South Wales.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment