Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Rex Edwards [2001] FCA 1384
No arguable case was shown by the debtor to justify going behind the judgment of the District Court; all formal requirements for a sequestration order were satisfied; therefore, the sequestration order should be made against the estate of the debtor.
- Parties
- Applicant: Commonwealth Bank of Australia; Respondent: Rex Edwards
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Petition for Sequestration Order Judgment
- Outcome
- sequestration order made against debtor's estate; creditor's costs to be taxed and paid from estate; act of bankruptcy date noted
- Legal Topics
- Sequestration Order, Judgment Debt, Going Behind a Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Applicant
Rex Edwards
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Petition for Sequestration Order Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a sequestration order should be made against the estate of the debtor based on non-compliance with a bankruptcy notice founded on a judgment debt
- 2 Whether there is a basis to go behind the judgment debt
Ratio Decidendi
No arguable case was shown by the debtor to justify going behind the judgment of the District Court; all formal requirements for a sequestration order were satisfied; therefore, the sequestration order should be made against the estate of the debtor.
Court Disposition
sequestration order made against debtor's estate; creditor's costs to be taxed and paid from estate; act of bankruptcy date noted
Orders
- A sequestration order be made against the estate of the debtor, Rex Edwards.
- The creditor's costs, including reserve costs if any, be taxed and paid from the estate of the debtor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment