Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Anastasopolios [2014] NSWSC 294
The defendant's defence did not raise any legally available or reasonably arguable defence to the plaintiff's monetary claim, and there being no specific limitation on the defendant's personal liability, summary judgment was appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Judgment' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether summary judgment should be entered for the plaintiff under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 13.1' 'Whether the defendant is personally liable for the debts incurred as trustee of a family trust']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's defence did not raise any legally available or reasonably arguable defence to the plaintiff's monetary claim, and there being no specific limitation on the defendant's personal liability, summary judgment was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- ['Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $443,600.21.' "Order the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings including the Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment