Commonwealth Development Bank of Australia Ltd v Rafidi & Anor [1999] NSWSC 616
The defendants failed to establish a bona fide defence and did not provide an adequate explanation for the delay in moving to set aside the default judgment. Justice is best served by not setting aside the default judgment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application/motion / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Application to set aside default judgment dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['default Judgment' 'setting Aside Judgment' 'service of Process' 'personal Guarantees' 'evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application/motion / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the default judgment should be set aside under Supreme Court Rules s 40 r 9(2)' 'Whether the defendants provided an adequate explanation for the delay' 'Whether the defendants have a bona fide defence']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants failed to establish a bona fide defence and did not provide an adequate explanation for the delay in moving to set aside the default judgment. Justice is best served by not setting aside the default judgment.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside default judgment dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The notice of motion filed 19 October 1998 is dismissed.' "The defendants are to pay the plaintiff's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment