Boreham v The Commonwealth of Australia [1953] HCA 56

Boreham v The Commonwealth of Australia [1953] HCA 56

The injunction was refused because the plaintiffs were remaining on a public reserve in a continuing offence against State law, and granting equitable relief would maintain them in that illegal position; in any event, the Commonwealth was in de facto possession and could rely on possessory rights against the plaintiffs as trespassers unless they showed a better title.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction and Appeal / Appeal From an Order Refusing an Interim Injunction; Application to Grant an Injunction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed and application refused with costs.
Legal Topics
['interlocutory Injunction' 'possessory Title' 'trespass' 'public Reserve' 'illegal Occupation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Interlocutory Injunction and Appeal / Appeal From an Order Refusing an Interim Injunction; Application to Grant an Injunction

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiffs should receive an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendants from ejecting them from Bunnerong Park.' 'Whether the Commonwealth could rely on de facto possession or possessory title against the plaintiffs as trespassers.' 'Whether a court of equity should grant an injunction where doing so would maintain the plaintiffs in a continuing illegal position on a public reserve.']

Ratio Decidendi

The injunction was refused because the plaintiffs were remaining on a public reserve in a continuing offence against State law, and granting equitable relief would maintain them in that illegal position; in any event, the Commonwealth was in de facto possession and could rely on possessory rights against the plaintiffs as trespassers unless they showed a better title.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed and application refused with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed and application refused with costs.']