Munday v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2014] FCA 1123

Munday v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2014] FCA 1123

The applicants failed to prove unlawful disability discrimination. The evidence did not show that Commonwealth officers treated Ms Day less favourably because of infertility or depression, or that the handling of her IVF-related applications was discriminatory rather than based on perceived evidentiary deficiencies and the view that the proposed use of funds was unlawful in Australia. Although the Commonwealth conceded that it imposed a requirement or condition that the funds be used for a purpose lawful in Australia and did not prove that requirement reasonable, the applicants did not prove that Ms Day was unable to comply with it because of her infertility, since a woman with the same...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 October 2014
Procedural Posture
Application Alleging Unlawful Disability Discrimination Under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (cth) in the Conduct of a Commonwealth Program for Early Release of Superannuation on Compassionate Grounds / Final Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['disability Discrimination' 'direct Discrimination' 'indirect Discrimination' 'reasonable Adjustment' 'early Release of Superannuation on Compassionate Grounds' 'ivf Treatment' 'person Aggrieved' 'commonwealth Program']
['human Rights' 'discrimination' 'administrative Law' 'superannuation'] ['disability Discrimination' 'direct Discrimination' 'indirect Discrimination' 'reasonable Adjustment' 'early Release of Superannuation on Compassionate Grounds' 'ivf Treatment' 'person Aggrieved' 'commonwealth Program']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Alleging Unlawful Disability Discrimination Under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (cth) in the Conduct of a Commonwealth Program for Early Release of Superannuation on Compassionate Grounds / Final Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Commonwealth discriminated against Ms Day on the ground of disability in assessing, reviewing and refusing her applications for early release of superannuation on compassionate grounds.' 'Whether identifying and assessing the application as involving IVF treatment amounted to direct disability discrimination.' 'Whether imposing or applying a requirement that released superannuation funds be used for a purpose lawful in Australia amounted to indirect disability discrimination.' 'Whether failure to obtain an independent legal opinion was a failure to make a reasonable adjustment.' 'Whether Mr Munday was an affected person or person aggrieved with standing to bring the proceeding.']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants failed to prove unlawful disability discrimination. The evidence did not show that Commonwealth officers treated Ms Day less favourably because of infertility or depression, or that the handling of her IVF-related applications was discriminatory rather than based on perceived evidentiary deficiencies and the view that the proposed use of funds was unlawful in Australia. Although the Commonwealth conceded that it imposed a requirement or condition that the funds be used for a purpose lawful in Australia and did not prove that requirement reasonable, the applicants did not prove that Ms Day was unable to comply with it because of her infertility, since a woman with the same...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicants pay the respondent's costs."]