Commonwealth of Australia v Oceantalk Australia Pty Ltd & Anor [1996] FCA 1126
A sufficient case for interlocutory relief by way of notifying purchasers of risks and correcting defects has been made out, but not for an injunction stopping sales; the balance of convenience supports orders for notification and correction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Urgent Interlocutory Relief / Interlocutory Hearing
- Outcome
- Interlocutory relief granted in the form of notification orders and directions for correction; injunction not granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['misrepresentation' 'trade Practices Act' 'copyright' 'interlocutory Relief']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Urgent Interlocutory Relief / Interlocutory Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether misrepresentations were made in connection with the supply of electronic charts' 'Whether urgent interlocutory relief should be granted under section 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974']
Ratio Decidendi
A sufficient case for interlocutory relief by way of notifying purchasers of risks and correcting defects has been made out, but not for an injunction stopping sales; the balance of convenience supports orders for notification and correction.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory relief granted in the form of notification orders and directions for correction; injunction not granted.
Orders
- ['Navionics SpA to send notice (Attachment A) to all purchasers and owners of the cartridges identified, within 14 days, and continue to supply notice to future purchasers, with modifications as corrections are made.' 'Navionics SpA to file and serve by 17 February 1997 a statement of steps taken to amend...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment