Wilkes v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 142
Further deferment of the trial would be unfair, particularly to Mr Bodney, due to unexplained delay by SWAL&SCAC and lack of assurance in compliance with new timetables. The interests of justice require the trial to proceed.
- Parties
- First Combined Applicants: Richard Wilkes and Albert Corunna on behalf of the Darbarlyung Nyoongars of the Derbal Yerrigan and the Swan River Plains; Second Combined Applicants: Robert Charles Bropho on behalf of the Swan Valley Nyungah Community; Third Combined Applicants: William Warrell on behalf of the Warrell Family; Fourth Combined Applicants: Gregory Lawrence Garlett and Kelvin Patrick Garlett on behalf of the Garlett Family; Bodney Applicants: Corrie Christopher Bodney on behalf of the Bodney Family Ballaruks; Respondents: State of Western Australia and Ors; Respondent: Commonwealth of Australia; Respondent: Various local government bodies and some mining interests; Respondent: WAFIC; Respondent: Group 15 in WAG 142/98 and Group 12 in WAG 149/98; Respondent: Town of Bassendean & others (various local government bodies); Party: South West Aboriginal Land & Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation (SWAL&SCAC)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title / Motion to Vacate Trial Dates
- Outcome
- Motion to vacate trial dates refused.
- Legal Topics
- Practice and Procedure, Vacation of Trial Dates, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Wilkes and Albert Corunna on behalf of the Darbarlyung Nyoongars of the Derbal Yerrigan and the Swan River Plains
First Combined Applicants
Robert Charles Bropho on behalf of the Swan Valley Nyungah Community
Second Combined Applicants
William Warrell on behalf of the Warrell Family
Third Combined Applicants
Gregory Lawrence Garlett and Kelvin Patrick Garlett on behalf of the Garlett Family
Fourth Combined Applicants
Corrie Christopher Bodney on behalf of the Bodney Family Ballaruks
Bodney Applicants
State of Western Australia and Ors
Respondents
Commonwealth of Australia
Respondent
Various local government bodies and some mining interests
Respondent
WAFIC
Respondent
Group 15 in WAG 142/98 and Group 12 in WAG 149/98
Respondent
Town of Bassendean & others (various local government bodies)
Respondent
South West Aboriginal Land & Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation (SWAL&SCAC)
Party
Procedural Posture
Native Title / Motion to Vacate Trial Dates
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the trial dates for the hearing of combined native title applications be vacated at the request of SWAL&SCAC.
Ratio Decidendi
Further deferment of the trial would be unfair, particularly to Mr Bodney, due to unexplained delay by SWAL&SCAC and lack of assurance in compliance with new timetables. The interests of justice require the trial to proceed.
Court Disposition
Motion to vacate trial dates refused.
Orders
- Motion to vacate trial dates refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment