Commonwealth of Australia v. Henderson, J.H. [1985] FCA 209
The Tribunal did not err in considering the effect of tinnitus when assessing the percentage of hearing loss; such assessment and quantification were findings of fact upon the evidence, not errors of law, and therefore not appealable under s.44(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.
- Parties
- Applicant: Commonwealth of Australia; Respondent: John Hillier Henderson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Workers Compensation, Assessment of Hearing Loss, Tinnitus and Hearing Loss, Interpretation of 'loss of Hearing' in Statutory Context
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commonwealth of Australia
Applicant
John Hillier Henderson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'loss of hearing' under the Compensation (Commonwealth Government Employees) Act 1971 is limited to sensori-neural hearing loss
- 2 Whether tinnitus may be accounted for as part of hearing loss under the Act
- 3 Whether the Tribunal's assessment of hearing loss including tinnitus amounts to an error of law for purposes of s.44(1) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not err in considering the effect of tinnitus when assessing the percentage of hearing loss; such assessment and quantification were findings of fact upon the evidence, not errors of law, and therefore not appealable under s.44(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment