COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA v McLEAN [1997] NSWCA 77
Specific directions were given under SCR pt 51 r 16(5) permitting the use of prior trial evidence transcripts for certain witnesses, subject to further cross-examination and just exceptions, to ensure fairness and convenience in the conduct of the second trial.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Australia; Defendant: McLean
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment Ancillary Orders Prior to Second Trial
- Outcome
- Ancillary orders granted under SCR pt 51 r 16(5) providing directions for conduct of evidence and proceedings at second trial. Costs of today's hearing to be costs in the new trial.
- Legal Topics
- Use of Evidence From First Trial in Second Trial, Directions Under SCR Pt 51 R 16(5)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commonwealth of Australia
Plaintiff
McLean
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment Ancillary Orders Prior to Second Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether and to what extent evidence from the first trial may be read or reused at the second trial under SCR pt 51 r 16(5)
- 2 Directions on costs and attendance of witnesses for the second trial
- 3 Whether to bind the Commonwealth to earlier evidentiary rulings
Ratio Decidendi
Specific directions were given under SCR pt 51 r 16(5) permitting the use of prior trial evidence transcripts for certain witnesses, subject to further cross-examination and just exceptions, to ensure fairness and convenience in the conduct of the second trial.
Court Disposition
Ancillary orders granted under SCR pt 51 r 16(5) providing directions for conduct of evidence and proceedings at second trial. Costs of today's hearing to be costs in the new trial.
Orders
- Testimony in chief of Mr and Mrs McLean at first trial may be read from transcript at second trial; cross-examination to be fresh.
- Full evidence of Mr Ryan at first trial may be read; Commonwealth entitled to further cross-examine; costs of Mr Ryan's attendance to be met by Commonwealth initially.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment