Commonwealth of Australia v Clark [2000] NSWCA 174

No error was found in the primary judge's factual findings or evaluation of the material facts communicated to the plaintiff in 1997, and the application for leave to appeal was refused with costs.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 11 July 2000
Procedural Posture: Civil / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal refused with costs
Legal Topics: ['limitation of Actions' 'extension of Limitation Period']

['civil Procedure'] ['limitation of Actions' 'extension of Limitation Period']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the primary judge erred in evaluating the significance of information received by the plaintiff in 1997 for the purposes of extending the limitation period under s 60G(2) of the Limitation Act 1969.']

Ratio Decidendi

No error was found in the primary judge's factual findings or evaluation of the material facts communicated to the plaintiff in 1997, and the application for leave to appeal was refused with costs.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused with costs

Orders

['Application for leave to appeal refused with costs']

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.